PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): What can we learn by comparing male/male relationships data with female/female data?
Added 2024-06-27 04:05:01 +0000 UTC
Comments
@JO Yes, I’d say female viciousness definitely comes from our more emotional state.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-10-27 04:31:04 +0000 UTCIt’s true generally, but I match/mirror others much less than most women - basically only strongly with a man I’m pair bonded to & even then I still have a very strong internal locus of control.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-10-16 16:12:41 +0000 UTC@EC - So it was mental abuse, not physical abuse?
Eric Linden
2024-09-26 08:40:07 +0000 UTC@E C - What a TRULY "quality" response. I would venture to say that this has got to be, BY FAR, the MOST mature and self-healing post that I have EVER heard you make. I am very VERY impressed indeed with your growth. 👍👍👍
Joseph Omega
2024-09-26 07:38:02 +0000 UTC@E C - RhodiumMaiden seems to think women are the more "violent minded" and "vicious" sex. Do you agree? But I'm curious about your question though -- I never really asked you why your OWN father was so violent (and you never volunteered). Is it that women always need a reason, but men do not?
Joseph Omega
2024-09-26 05:26:52 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - I would also be curious to have your take on the content of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxCwYDxZOy0
Joseph Omega
2024-08-13 22:11:01 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - So, is "violent- minded" different from ACTUALLY "violent"? Does your assessment of "viciousness" have to do with your hyper-emotive nature, rather than your "killer instinct"?
Joseph Omega
2024-08-13 01:05:39 +0000 UTCI’m on an iPad and TikTok links have never worked for me in any browser. 🤷♀️ I do definitely agree with that clip & the takeaway though. Good info, thanks!
RhodiumMaiden
2024-08-02 23:47:57 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - I don't "have" TikTok either, but one shouldn't need to have the app installed (or even a TikTok account) in order to view this video. Still, here is a link to a portion of a YouTube reaction video that features the original Turkish clip that was at the heart of it: https://youtu.be/GFMHX1eBmAg?t=179
Joseph Omega
2024-08-01 21:11:21 +0000 UTC@Joseph I think women are the vicious sex. This is probably for evolutionary reasons because we need to be able to defend our children if no man is around - a mama bear instinct.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-08-01 20:15:28 +0000 UTC@Joseph Sorry, I don’t have TikTok.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-08-01 20:04:30 +0000 UTCOne thing I would suggest is more people stop wasting their time in the comments section trying to shield their computer egos and go for a walk in the rainforest or spend a day at the beach. Technology and phones are what is radically indoctrinating people with vicious propaganda (with regards to feminism, the early movement has been hijacked by manipulative people like George Soros and Blackrock - something I'm sure you'd know working around computer software and obviously reading one too many forums) and is just another means of manipulating people into divide and then conquer us with fake vaccines and lockdowns at home...ohh yes Joseph, I'm much more bitter than you understand. But an IT engineer who gives himself the last name omega 😂👍 priceless. Omega keyboards 😂😂👍👍 I don't have to respond further I think even layman can read this convo and make a fair assessment. Get some sun big fella 👍
paddy darcy
2024-07-26 21:39:34 +0000 UTC@paddy darcy - Actually I'm an engineer in IT, so all I know from the field is what I read and learn from professed professionals here and elsewhere -- no work experience in the area. I practice in the metropolitan DC area. I don't know you of course, but you sound uncommonly bitter and angry even for this forum. Though I think I can perfectly understand why if you are as you described yourself. May I ask, as a once practicing professional in this area, what made you first enter the field, when did you leave, and, if it were up to you, what SPECIFIC practical recommendations and steps would YOU enact to put the profession back on track? If, as you say, you have been following my comments and conversations here in this Patreon, then you must know that I am no great fan of the Feminist ideological movement as well as their wholly self-defeating endorsement of woke culture, in particular their unrestrained promotion of Transgenderism, especially among minors. But I will neither stick my head in the sand, nor hope that good intentions or wishful thinking will pull "Western" civilization back from the edge of cultural oblivion -- I seek to understand the phenomena that contribute to the decline.
Joseph Omega
2024-07-26 15:31:40 +0000 UTCAs I'm not a current practicing physician (as my beliefs don't allign with what were told to do - in terms of treatment for above discussed people), I don't have to subscribe to what the system shoves down other physicians throats and makes them regurgitate back to their clients. I work as a surveyor these days as the politics and crap one has to put up with as an intellectual and critical thinking physician is just sheer lunacy. Your retorts are exemplary to what I mean by that. Again the differentiation of Autogynephilic and Autoandrophilic came after gender disphoria and is merely an overcomplication of what is quite simple and easy to understand. Unfortunately people like yourself like to add layers and split hairs when all these people are is mentally ill and the treatment for all is much the same and doesn't involve chemicals or wrapping them in bubble wrap and playing these 1000 label games. Harsh truth and reality usually brings people to earth but most PC individuals and their rhetoric don't like it and suggest that harsh reality could cause some of these gender disphoric people to commit self harm or suicide. Then the same individuals flip the debate and suggest that those dishing out harsh truths are evil and abusive. Sticks and stones Joseph... Plus I'd love to know 1. What level of education you have on this topic, 2. If you have ever worked in this field, 3. In what jurisdiction do you practice your skills?
paddy darcy
2024-07-26 02:33:21 +0000 UTC@paddy darcy - You certainly don't SOUND like the usual "trained observer" -- aren't you guys now compelled to practice "affirmation therapy" or some such? Also, the hypothesis you thought I was "frothing over" had more to do with the connection BETWEEN these two "rainbow people", only ONE of which is associated with "gender dysphoria" -- but you must know this (involving the discussion between Autogynephilic and Autoandrophilic Individuals?). In what jurisdiction do you practice your skills?
Joseph Omega
2024-07-26 00:27:39 +0000 UTCNow now Joseph, no need to brush off my comment with such a nonchalant backhanded remark suggesting I'm some sort of untrained observer. I'm a qualified psychotherapist with a master's in psychology and also educated in physiology, anatomy and biology. Pretty sure I'm educated enough to not only formulate an opinion on the topic but also see mindless rabble from a mile away. The hypothesis which you're frothing over is called gender disphoria and yes it's been known for a while as a fact, not a hypothesis. The only thing that changed over the years has been the wording due to mentally ill rainbow peoples feelings (getting more dumbed down and simplified so idiots think they understand but essentially overcomplicate matters). Judging by the fact your on everyone's case in every comments section of every video, says a lot about the kind of person you are. Definitely on some spectrum that your gasbaging about 😂😂😂
paddy darcy
2024-07-25 07:45:39 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - I'm not sure if I've already posted this interesting video on the topic: https://www.tiktok.com/@demidelanuit/video/7288488935028722990?q=men%20lover%20harder&t=1717054203940
Joseph Omega
2024-07-25 04:54:36 +0000 UTC@paddy darcy - Well, I'm not sure the video was intended for the casual observer: It is the nature of in-depth analyses deep within professions of any type to appear like "gasbagging" to the untrained outside observer. However, I was particularly interested in the hypothesis that homosexuality and transsexuality (whether considered an illness or not) both lie along the very same spectrum, with the latter being described as a more advanced version of the former.
Joseph Omega
2024-07-25 04:50:11 +0000 UTCI see a turning tide. Hopefully squeaky wheels will soon be replaced and/or realise that they need to act more with their positivity rather than forcing backwards ideology down societys throat like it's some depraved sexual activity that has to be forced upon non rainbow people.
paddy darcy
2024-07-25 04:50:03 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - Can you explain "violent-mindedness" such that you think you possess it more than men?
Joseph Omega
2024-07-25 04:41:09 +0000 UTC@RhodiumMaiden - I cannot comment as to the evolutionary sense of any of these paraphilia, but the phenomena HAS been apparently observed in non-human animals: https://chatgpt.com/share/5746fdfb-f525-49f2-bdd6-6ef3d425af6b
Joseph Omega
2024-07-25 04:38:03 +0000 UTC@paddy darcy - The answer to your question as to the pandering can probably be summed up In two words: Politics and Activism -- the loudest and most persistently squeaky wheels get the most grease.
Joseph Omega
2024-07-25 04:35:05 +0000 UTCDifferent brains = mentally ill. They have just developed coping mechanisms or adopted personalities they saw that they perceived as gay and confident/successful and decided to go with it. I used to think there was grey when it came to sexuality but that's just mentally ill garbage rhetoric only there to confuse us all into acceptance but never improving as a society. Again I refer to the fall of Rome and how a major part of that was linked to an overindulgence in sexual promiscuity and usually promoted from those with abnormal sexual preferences or an over fixation on their sexual identity. At the base level, sex is purely for reproduction. Whatever stimulatory pleasure people derive from it is completely and utterly selfish. Now when people obfuscate the natural process of reproduction in favour of their preference for sexual stimulatory pleasure...then you end up with brain dead idiots who only proliferate and exacerbate the problem, when it's accepted or deemed okay by the broader community. It's a failure on humanity's part in staying focused on what matters instead of getting distracted by what doesn't (and only degrades our thinking if we fall for the "gays are okays" trap). They're sick and need help getting back on track. Ever since Australia voted to let fags get married in church, it's done nothing but exacerbate the fags egos and give them more of a platform to act like sexually depraved idiots and mentally ill fuckheads, while society accepts it all and goes along with it?! I get it, gays are more subtle and make you feel like you actually have male friends but they're f****d in the head and you should avoid their subtle and manipulate ways of double speak (as your just feeding each other's attention disorders and making the problem worse). Like the sex analogy earlier, I'm sure they say the right things to make you feel nice and stimulate your happy emotions but really it's just accepting more of their way of living as okay, when in reality it's not, it's just a facade.
paddy darcy
2024-07-19 23:41:37 +0000 UTCLesbians & trannies, yes. Gay men I think not necessarily, they just have different brains - but I agree that they are degenerate, so perhaps in that way they they are mentally ill as well. It makes sense evolutionarily for some small percentage of men to be gay. But it makes no sense for women to be gay or for anyone to be trans.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 15:40:52 +0000 UTCThey’re going to be less healthy without breastfeeding & early nurturing by bio mom.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 15:27:17 +0000 UTCI had one guy slap me & knock me & the (small, lightweight) couch I was on over. it was actually really mild though and I wasn’t injured. Interestingly, I didn’t feel afraid at any point I was just incredibly shocked. He never hit me again - yes I was stupid not to immediately break up with him permanently. Ofc I did make him leave right away after the incident, but I forgave him after like a week. In my defence, I was going through the most difficult time in my life. I have never hit anyone, but I feel like I’m more violent- minded than most men by far.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 15:24:54 +0000 UTCI do think of gay men as separate from straight men, but I find their promiscuity just as gross. Otherwise I don’t mind gay men, but I’ve only ever had 3 as friends when I was a teen - they came out later. I had no idea about 2 of them either! In fact, I had a crush on one of them. I love straight men, both platonically and otherwise.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 15:16:43 +0000 UTCI’ve always realised men were more romantic & willing to commit & less violent in relationships. Maybe bc of my my mom vs my dads. This is amazing data everyone needs to see this video.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-07-19 15:06:22 +0000 UTCP.s. that video was a couple of psychs gassbaging about nothing other than their opinion of a DSM interpretation (which is essentially a compilation of opinions). Giving the title of mentally ill, isn't only justified for sake of preventing subjective people buying into gay dogmatic reasons for support but also to help these people realise they are ill and need help...or of they don't want help, don't expect society to listen. Entertaining the slightest bit of homosexuality into society is entertaining mental disorders and debauchery. It happened to Rome and where's Rome nowadays?
paddy darcy
2024-07-12 22:51:04 +0000 UTCJoseph, what ever happened to gender disphoria? Got watered down with all the other facts of life along with the censorship of any language that hurts homo's feelings. Never understood why society panders to 3% of the population? There's no trend other than mental illness being indulged and promoted by society in the coddling of the rainbow people and their mental illnesses.
paddy darcy
2024-07-12 22:36:52 +0000 UTCI tried for some 5 years ago to privately arranged donate sperma to a lesbian couple. There was something very eiry with that ordeal that I not came across ad sperms donor to a hospital IVF clinic. This feeling of the couples rejection of my male archetype was infuriating. Very interesting experience. I had to end the visits to them donate ejaculate to them.
Tord Pettersson
2024-07-12 15:26:10 +0000 UTCI'm not sure I would go so far as to call it "mentally ill", but I do tend to disagree with the DSM redesignation of such propensities as other than "paraphilias". Here is an interesting interview that poses a unique angle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPAcWtDdHAg Personally, a paraphilia is simply an anomalous sexual behavior or attraction that is considered "outside the norm" -- clearly the advance of evolution rewards and is dependent on procreation, so most of these letters are immediately inconsistent with it -- no value judgement intended or implied one way of the other.
Joseph Omega
2024-07-10 19:24:07 +0000 UTCAnyone else think LGBTQ rainbow people are mentally ill?
paddy darcy
2024-07-07 23:23:24 +0000 UTCI see, I just wanted to know if the data was absolute or relative, sometimes it gets thrown around unreliably
Heitor Miranda
2024-07-06 22:00:36 +0000 UTCThe RELATIVE sizes of data sets does not affect the reliability of the data or the analysis, only the ABSOLUTE sizes of the data sets (that is the sample sizes) themselves. As of 2020, there were 3.3 million single father households -- much more than enough to prove statistical significance: https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP68941.html
Joseph Omega
2024-07-06 21:40:10 +0000 UTCJust asking, it's really easy to say# fatherless homes are more likely to produce unbalanced children, but aren't there way more fatherless homes that homes without moms? It may be unreliable data.
Heitor Miranda
2024-07-06 00:42:53 +0000 UTC@E C - Alas, they necessarilly are in VERY high demand -- I may have to lower my standards a trifle, and work to renovate a potential "boat".
Joseph Omega
2024-07-02 06:40:37 +0000 UTCAbsolutely agree. It's troubling though for me that nowadays you can't discipline children like I was by my parents. I am not for physical punishment, and times my parents laid hands on me I can count on on hand - but I definitely remember why and I can't say I didn't deserve it. They mostly raised their voice and grounded me, and again, thinking back - I did deserve it. It is challenge to raise kids nowadays, and I honestly fear for future generations. Because children that grow up without any consequences for their actions are going to be even bigger snowflakes and loser than we have today in the world.
Kestrel993
2024-07-01 09:27:30 +0000 UTC@E C - I don't necessarilly see "radical feminists" and "boyfriends" as inherently incompatible -- much depends I suspect on how the latter is defined by and allowed to behave towards the former. Still, as you've probably gathered from other conversations here, I'm prone to think of Feminism itself as a "radical" ideology, as it is apparently based upon what I believe to be the false, highly prejudicial, highly contentious, culturally dangerous and potentially civilization and species-threatening dual tenets of a "historically oppressive Patriarchy", as well as the equally PREPOSTEROUS idea of "historically pervasive misogyny" (given the fact that we are a SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC species with a very VERY long evolutionarilly successful history of intergender co-operation and co-adaptations ... prior to the spread of recent distructive "social contagions" to the contrary).
Joseph Omega
2024-07-01 08:59:10 +0000 UTC@E C - If you are careful with your sexual reputation, then you may well be atypical among modern "Western" women. It is a cliche (but still a TRUISM) that men are attracted to two distinct types of women, based almost EXCLUSIVELY upon their "utility" -- you are of course familiar with the popular (though somewhat crude) expression, which I need not repeat here. "Party girls" certainly have their "short-term" or "primal" appeal, as they obviously dominate the more stereotypical category associated with "hook-up culture" (and generally not "respected"), but the type of girl I CONSCIOUSLY had in mind when I spoke of a "woman who effortlessly hangs around men" was not really of that type, though I can see why you would automatically think it was -- I can't say that I particularly "like" them for very long, as I personally tire of superficiality easily. I was simply envisioning a generic girl who, under other circumstances, could even be described as "shy" (or better "reserved"), preferring the company of men due to a natural attraction to, or appreciation of, intrinsic "male energy" being displayed as "masculine" attributes or interests (like sports or technology or the outdoors or videogames or politics). Such a woman need not necessarilly even be "tomboyish" (as opposed to "butch"), but could be simply "intellectual" or "thoughtful", while retaining their femininity, but with an aversion to those of her gender who feel the compulsion towards "girl-bossing", "entitlement", "bitterness", "gossip" or "drama". Certainly such women run the risk of being unjustly "tainted" as "sluts" due to their associations, MOST OFTEN by her female peers I might add (also unfortunately also by insecure and immature men), but given the correct conditions, "honorable" men around them can easily police against and protect their reputations -- I shared the company of several such "Sigma Females" during my undergraduate years (granted Engineering was an academic pursuit that probably pre-filters highly for or attracts such individuals). Such women often exude a natural inner confidence in their femininity, and hence inspire a level of practical respect and admiration commensurate with the more "marriageable" category of men's interests.
Joseph Omega
2024-07-01 07:30:51 +0000 UTC@E C - Interesting. A matter of perspective I suspect, as any man hanging around many women in purely and CLEARLY platonic circumstances, signals to many OTHER men that they may be either gay or a simp. Either way, not a good look to their peers. Conversely, a woman who effortlessly hangs around men (especially being the center of their attention), signals to many men that they are neither a Lesbian nor a "frigid, stuck-up b*tch" (pardoning my French of course 🙏). I KNOW you have a problem with "pick-me" girls, but I can ASSURE you, most normal men CATEGORICALLY do NOT. And, because of their relative rarity in relation to REGULAR guys (the "lower" 90%), "groupies" are FAR more often than not EXTREMELY attractive -- it should not really be that hard to see why. Additionally of course, men really don't CARE what other women think of either type. I VERY frequently hear women describe so many of their FEMALE friends as "acquaintances", regardless of their apparent closeness (as in sharing secrets, clothes, time and laughter with each other), but the intragender communication and psychology of women is notoriously "meta-messaged" and indirect, frequently defying the ability of common males to fully comprehend (we tend to interpret it as "hypocritical" or "pretensive"). However, your usage of the term with respect to MALES seems a bit unusual, but not particularly surprising. Do these "male acquaintances" KNOW that's what they are, or are they really effectively just "orbiters", clandestinely biding their time? How would you REALLY know for sure? As I said earlier, men are notorious for their inability to let go of "lost causes".
Joseph Omega
2024-06-30 08:38:13 +0000 UTC@E C - The "Frendzone Fear" appears to be a relatively recent development -- traditionally men DO want to be "around women", as the perception was that this at least puts them within striking distance of the targets of their affection. But you ARE correct that MOST men, being more sexually direct and focussed, seem to possess a far lower taste for the "cat and mouse" games which women appear so adept at and comfortable with. But, being evolutionarilly adapted for the "long hunt", men DO tend to possess a blindness to "lost causes" in this arena, not knowing when to let the prey go. In contrast, women appear often QUITE satisfied with just the ATTENTION of suitors or even just admirers ("orbiters"?), even those to which they have ZERO sexual interest.
Joseph Omega
2024-06-30 02:58:14 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - Can only speak for myself, my two older brothers, and the host of male cousins of similar age that I spent time with, but boys seem to enjoy both the accomplishment and the power that accompanies the construction of things as well as their de-construction -- two sides of the same coin. Occasionally when very young, males WOULD break a thing in anger or frustration, but VERY quickly learn, through direct punishment by a strong authority figure (like a parent), or through the pain of the loss of use (and lack of replacement) of the broken item itself, that such tantrums have immediate counterproductive and deleterious follow-up effects. I don't get the impression that young girls tend to go through as severe a learning process (of direct punishment or unreplaced loss), so their ability to conceive of the Karma linking their negative action to its consequences is not as clear cut.
Joseph Omega
2024-06-30 02:31:28 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I asked ChatGPT to refine and tabulate the findings -- via the same link.
Joseph Omega
2024-06-30 02:03:31 +0000 UTCYour chat GPT is right overall, but, as AG says in the video, many studies group all homosexuals together. And Chat GPT here groups all LGBTQ groups together. The trend is actually opposite for men and women, and since there about twice as many lesbians than gays in the LGBTQ mega group, the study goes towards straight.
Eric Linden
2024-06-30 00:19:07 +0000 UTCI think there is an evolutionary psychology component to this as well. When I was a kid, yes, boys more than girls were taught not to hit. Today parents seem to emphasise it equally among both sexes. But with kids today, including my own, the boys seem to restrain themselves more than the girls. I notice boys from an early age like to build things, then destroy them. Could be legos, a row of racecars, or a puzzle. They put something in order, then bring back the chaos. Maybe that is evolution at work directing their anger at an object rather than a person.
Eric Linden
2024-06-30 00:03:31 +0000 UTCMen are taught from young age to control themselves and any hitting (specially hitting a girl) is not allowed and would (while I was kid) be punished. Meanwhile girls express their anger trough tantrums and crying. When they are little it's easier to control, I think, because I never saw 3 y.o. girl grabbing something and breaking it just because she was mad. Grown women on the other hand are know to break their partner's belongings even on them (partner) as well.
Kestrel993
2024-06-29 18:36:02 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I guess we've all had our own harrowing tales: I was once threatened awake with a steak knife, to which I DID call the police. No followup charges were filed, but the shock of my action seemingly established much needed behavioral boundaries at the time (that relationship has since ended).
Joseph Omega
2024-06-29 16:37:21 +0000 UTC@Eric Linden - I actually never knew this (but I am not suprised) -- I learn SO much in these groups! https://chatgpt.com/share/bc06bc9f-66eb-4c48-8781-ba7340517af7
Joseph Omega
2024-06-29 16:22:19 +0000 UTCThe majority of teenage women who are bisexual are straight by age 25. The majority of teenage men who are bisexual are gay by age 25.
Eric Linden
2024-06-29 13:28:24 +0000 UTC@Tomer Shamay - See Robert Sapolsky on homosexual behavior in humans as well as other species: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPYmarGO5jM&t=242s
Joseph Omega
2024-06-29 07:50:59 +0000 UTC@E C - That or the fact that many (if not MOST) lesbians are PERCEIVED to be "Radical Feminists", and men (straight OR gay) have learned to stay very VERY far away from such individuals. I don't know if there are such things as "Radical Masculists" (MGTOW and Incels maybe?), but it is hard to imagine them as simultaneously gay, so there would be little necessity for straight women to stay away from them.
Joseph Omega
2024-06-29 07:31:37 +0000 UTCWhen you mentioned men not making tons of lesbian friends, one popped into my mind. A lesbian woman, to me, is just another woman. Most women don't hit on me, like lesbian women. Most women behave in a similar way to me as lesbian women. So I see very little difference. Compare this to gay men. They act way differently to women than other men do. There's no undertone of hitting on them in an interaction, which I think where women start ending up liking them through the change in interaction style
Alexander Gresham-Thompson
2024-06-28 11:20:46 +0000 UTCGreat point. In the public arena, I consider this to be no concern of mine as long as the person acts within the rule of law or respects an institution’s policies and practices. When it comes to inter-personal relationships, I have let go of the practice of “being smaller” to help a woman feel safer. In short, I no longer get hooked into trying to prove that I am safer than the bear. I am willing to “be there” for a woman as long as she has earned that privilege. Interestingly, women can see what me “being there” for them may look like by watching me with my two young daughters because I am a single solo parent. Furthermore, sometimes, I notice when they notice.
Mark Bryski
2024-06-28 07:59:14 +0000 UTCI think as men, we severely underestimate feminine "feels" before "reals"; it is more powerful than we can possibly imagine. As we have learned from AG, women have no problems with cognitive dissonance, even in the presence of rational data. Case in point, wage gap fallacy had been debunked again and again over the years, yet an angry blue haired feminist today would still consider it an crying injustice that needs to be put right. I heard about IPV stat from Jordan Peterson couple years ago between gay and lesbian couples, but no surprise so many people still don't know about it as there has been continued and concerted media effort to suppress any such information from becoming mainstream.
Hyperion
2024-06-28 04:33:20 +0000 UTCWomen understand women, and they hate each other. -- Al Bundy from Married with Children. Wisdom can come even from the most unlikely of places.
Hyperion
2024-06-28 04:16:51 +0000 UTCI have not been hit. I had false allegations of child abuse. She ended up being the child abuser. While child abuse was being investigated, it was "assumed" I was committing domestic violence. At one point, within a span of two weeks, I had a therapist and then a social worker notify me "CAS (Children's Aid Society) is surveilling you and not helping your children".
Mark Bryski
2024-06-28 00:15:08 +0000 UTCI suspect that homosexual dating advice is somewhat different; but homosexual relationship advice is very similar.
Eric Linden
2024-06-27 21:58:43 +0000 UTCOutcomes: We now know the disastrous outcomes for children from single mothers and lesbian couples. And we know that outcomes are about the same for single fathers and straight couples. I would be interested in seeing statistics showing if children actually turn out better raised by two gay men. I wouldn’t be surprised.
Eric Linden
2024-06-27 21:40:09 +0000 UTCDomestic violence: Yes, I have been hit by several women. I have never hit back, and never called police. Anybody else?
Eric Linden
2024-06-27 21:23:51 +0000 UTCAG did ask at the end of the video for men with your experience to come forward. Thank you for that.
Eric Linden
2024-06-27 21:07:32 +0000 UTCHey Alex, something I have wanted to see from you for a long time is how homosexuals fit into evolutionary psychology. A lot of the explanations given are based on men and women being molded by their interactions by the other sex and homosexuals never really fit neatly for me. I don't know how to use evolutionary psychology to give a homosexual dating advice because it just seems like the advice I have is so curated to appeal to the female mind. I think it would be interesting and help cover the whole story of human interactions from all angles.
Tomer Shamay
2024-06-27 19:20:00 +0000 UTCWhat?! Never heard of such an amazing woman and life! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey
Joseph Omega
2024-06-27 16:17:21 +0000 UTCThe problem with the stats is that we have been comparing apples to oranges. Straight couples do get divorced after 5 or 10 years; and those heterosexual divorces have been baked into the stats this whole time. Before we only had a few years of stats on gay and lesbian couples. When the differences between gay and lesbian couples showed up in research, the two were combined because that didn’t fit the narrative. We won’t know the real numbers until we have 80 years of gay and lesbian marriages, but we are starting to get closer to the truth.
Eric Linden
2024-06-27 13:14:30 +0000 UTCYes, very true in my experience! I merely wanted to point out that for me the fact that she is lesbian might have played a role in making it easier for me to be friends with her.
Gumpert
2024-06-27 13:09:07 +0000 UTCOf course there are straight men that have lesbian friends. But there are lots more straight women that have gay friends.
Eric Linden
2024-06-27 13:02:48 +0000 UTCAlexander! I love you and ... I have a lesbian friend! I really like her! She is very clever, energetic, kind and open minded. If I were to say very homofobic things, she would be interested in why I hold those believes rather than act offended. We have shared interests and have been to events about those, just as I do with my male friends. At first I noticed I was really trying to convince myself I could be with a pink haired girl, picturing some of the raised eyebrows this would undoubtedly cause in my family, but once I realized she was lesbian, that all fell away and it was just very easy and with a mind at peace that I could spend time with her. So in conclusion, she is just an awesome human being and the fact that she has no sexual interest in me just makes it easier being around her. I think this is very similar as to how girls experience their male gay friends.
Gumpert
2024-06-27 11:31:47 +0000 UTCWomen base their sexuality on different things than men. That's why even heterosexual women are comfortable intimately touching other women, while heterosexual men wouldn't ever do that with another man.
Lioninwinter
2024-06-27 10:48:33 +0000 UTCErin Pizzey Why is the most influential person in the domestic violence industry never spoken about? Why is the woman who opened the world’s first refuge for women, and wrote the first book on domestic violence, erased from the history books? Why has the woman, who took domestic violence out from behind closed doors, and made it a national emergency, been living in the shadows of what is now a hundred million dollar industry? Why are plaudits, cash, and awards, rained down upon those who stole the limelight from her; six figure salaries dished out to the ones who highjacked her movement, and exiled her from her own charity? Why is Erin Pizzey not a household name? Well, I’lll tell you why…. She was erased and excommunicated because she stood up for truth, calling out “the big lie” of ‘gendered violence’, to assert again, and again - for half a century - that women are no less violent in relationships, and men are no less deserving of support. It was a choice that changed the course of her entire life. No longer the darling of a nation, but an outcast, the subject of picketing and violent threats. Erin literally started the domestic violence industry from her own house: she took in the first woman (Cathy) to her spare bedroom, and over the decades undoubtedly saved the lives of thousands of women and children. Yet she spent years with bomb squads going through her mail, and police escorts, as she travelled the country. Her greatest crime was caring as much about men as she did women.
Anthony White
2024-06-27 08:28:42 +0000 UTCI had a cluster B gf and eventually the fights had gotten so bad and the threats of her suiciding were so strong that I called the police. Police were kind and while she angrily accused me damaging her finger, I had two deep red bite marks and eventually they took her away and filed her for domestic violence. At the time I only wanted officials to be around when she did the mad things so I had a chance. In a convo with an officer I said that I assume that most victims of dom violence are women, and with a genuine voice of surprise the officer said: No, it's not like that. Also another officer said to me that the ten days she will be kept away from her home is for me to think about if I want this to go on. Took two days and I knew I didn't. She raged and rambled. I survived.
Bamboleate
2024-06-27 08:16:57 +0000 UTCThis is an important video because bigotry against men has become so normalized it is being used as a status hierarchy signaling mechanism. In short, you can show you are high status by demonstrating misandric beliefs. In fact, it appears to be mandatory in some environments. I believe this video will make a positive contribution to the public discourse on this topic. Thank you Alexander. I also believe we each have a role to play when encountering this type of bigotry from professionals and institutions. We do have agency and I encourage everyone to act on it whether there is an Ombudsman’s office, Human Rights Commission, a College regulating someone’s professional conduct, or a Board of Director who can be personally liable for the conduct of an institution. If someone is using misandry to play “fuck around and find out” with you, let them find out. Especially when children are involved.
Mark Bryski
2024-06-27 07:31:48 +0000 UTCOne of my closest friends in Uni was/is a lesbian. She was great to talk to, and just in general a great person. I miss her now that you've reminded me of her. I have a lot of platonic female friendships, so I believe it's more of a female friend who happened to be a lesbian, than any selection bias at play. It's similar to somebody telling me about their job, or a hobby they're into. It's just another piece of the puzzle that is your friend, that you can enjoy getting to know.
Devin Forbes
2024-06-27 06:22:58 +0000 UTCBravo! We’ve been waiting a long time for this one. The statistics have been creatively hidden using tricks like lumping men and women together whenever they don’t fit the narrative. But the truth eventually reveals itself. Thank you for putting the available statistics all together. The stats and video footage are revealing the true nature of men and women. More myths are ready to be debunked.
Eric Linden
2024-06-27 06:14:33 +0000 UTC
