Coding a Text Messaging System

Fixed this and the bug you listed above. Good catches!

Vren

Good catch! I ended up writing some functions to compare a girls outfit to existing uniform templates to resolve this. This means all of the events that deal with girls and uniforms now correctly handle situations where they strip off pieces of clothing or add their own accessories. It even handles fringe cases like a girl stripping off a piece of clothing but that stripped down state now matches a different uniform..

Vren

And while I'm here: In dates.rpy line 448 reads: $ her_hallway = Room(the_person.name +"'s front hall", the_person.name +"'s front hall", standard_house_backgrounds[:],[],[],[],False,[3,3], visible = False, lighting_conditions = standard_indoor_lighting) I think you meant $ her_hallway = Room(the_person.name +"'s front hall", the_person.name +"'s front hall", [], standard_house_backgrounds[:],[],[],[],False,[3,3], visible = False, lighting_conditions = standard_indoor_lighting) The difference is an extra [] between the names and the background. You should also probably add a '$ mc.location.show_background()' around line 493 or this location doesn't display at all. Currently the 'back to her place' will crash if she tries to accost you in the hallway.

I have an easier fix for a different bug. In crisis.rpy, line 3214 reads "the_person.draw_animated_removal(the_item, half_off_instead = True)" but you probably meant "the_person.draw_animated_removal(clothing, half_off_instead = True)" because you're for-each looping an object group and the objects are 'clothing' not, 'the_item' (which is used elsewhere in the crisis for while loops) Currently this causes the strip to fail and the event to end early if 'fuck her' is chosen during the horny at work crisis..

Hi Vren, You've got some beautiful dialogue branches written for flirting with girls who are in uniform but they'll never display because the_person.outfit will never equal the_person.planned_uniform, even in an 'complete outfit' where a combination every possible item is included (mmm, 3 different pairs of glasses and ALL the rings :P) This is tested in the personalities file for each of the flirt_response_low and flirt_response_mid, ect, line number varies depending on which personality but probably around 450ish. I'd also guess that it might cause some weirdness for the 'girl out of uniform' punishment event, but I haven't actually had that fire yet. I /think/ this is caused because uniforms, like most outfits, are merged with a characters existing outfit by apply_outfit. Since the outfits are dynamically created, I'm not certain there's an easy way to determine if a character is 'in uniform' by trying to compare what they're wearing to what they 'should' be wearing. You could have the outfit decider throw an unique ID string at whatever it creates and then pass that along to self_outfit. Then you compare the Unique IDs instead of the objects. I feel like this is open to future problems though, the passing of that ID could become a complex thread to follow in debugging. To me the simplest fix just seems to be to give your 'person' object a 'is_wearing_uniform' bool. Have apply_outfit set it to false by default unless its triggered by wear_uniform. So far as I can see you never apply an outfit except by using 'apply_outfit' or a uniform except by using 'wear_uniform' so it /should/ catch all current cases. Hope this helps.

hi still getting the errors of after births, the girls do not get back to work